Re: FAQ's in general

Personally, I'd like to see a list FAQ: What is GZG, what is each of the
separate systems(I'd suggest a fairly simple description, with
directions
to particular system FAQ's for details), what are some of the
resources(especially web) available...

Separate system FAQ's are appropriate: certain rules DO seem to get most
of
the questions, other questions are more esoteric. A complete rule/errata
database would be wonderful, but not a FAQ, methinks.

At the beginning, this all might be small enough for one document, but I
think the hierarchy makes sense, and if the dingus gets too big, can be
broken into separate components.

Is this sensible, or am I just an old, legacy-computing thinker?

The_Beast

> "What do you have when you have Bill Gates buried up to his
> head in sand?
Me yelling 'fore!'