Prev: RE: [ADMIN] Recent spam message Next: Re: [ADMIN] Recent spam message

Re: [ADMIN] Recent spam message

From: Matthew Seidl <seidl@v...>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 07:33:10 -0700
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Recent spam message

On Fri, 20 Feb 1998 10:26:06 +0000, Jonathan white writes:
>A couple of people have been in touch with me about a message they
>via the list that was a 'spam' message (i.e. an advert unrelated to the
>list content). 
>If people are going to complain about this *PLEASE*  remember not to
>the 'reply' function of your mailer - that will send your complaint to
>list itself, which will probably generate more irrelevant traffic than
>original spam. Instead, send it direct to..
>which is the address the message originated from. 

Just to chime in a bit, this is NOT where the message is from.

Received: from by (MX V4.2 AXP) with
	  Fri, 20 Feb 1998 07:39:10 +0000
Received: from default ( [])
by (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id BAA23793; Fri, 20 Feb
	  01:36:34 -0600

Looks like the injection point was off of (they run a LOT
of modems, not surprising), and the first relay was

I would suggest complaining to:,, mach3@MACH3WW.COM,

I would guess you'd get no reponse from, but that's where
I'd start.

If you would like more info about reading headers like this, take a
look at the links page off my lawsuit page (URL in sig).

-=- Matthew L. Seidl		email:		
=-= Graduate Student			Project . . . What Project?	
-=- 	 -Morrow Quotes 

Prev: RE: [ADMIN] Recent spam message Next: Re: [ADMIN] Recent spam message