Prev: RE: WET THRUST CONVERSION AGAIN!!! Next: RE: WET THRUST CONVERSION AGAIN!!!

Re: SV: Submunitions questions

From: mehawk@c... (Michael Sandy)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 1997 12:50:44 -0800
Subject: Re: SV: Submunitions questions

> Michael Sandy wrote:

> Of course, the damage potential of the EMP missile is very big - but
on
> average, it isn't that powerful. Also, in my experience those ships
most
> vulnerable to it (unscreened ones) are either Escorts or Kra'Vak, and
both
> types tend to be quite maneuvrable (and thus have an easier time to
avoid
> the missiles).

> Oerjan Ohlson

Oh, I forgot that Shields work against the EMP effects.  Well, a
volley of shield targeting missiles followed by a volley of EMPs
could be fun...

Thank you for providing the numbers on the EMP chances...
Michael Sandy


Prev: RE: WET THRUST CONVERSION AGAIN!!! Next: RE: WET THRUST CONVERSION AGAIN!!!