Re: Big Guns and Small Ships (was Re: house rules/offline)

Status: RO

>While trying to fix the system so that a "balanced" fleet will win 
>against a "Munchkin(tm)" fleet is admirable, and highly desired, I 
>don't think it's possible.  What I will suggest though is this: why
>not fight a destroyer or destroyer/cruiser only action?  Precedents
>exist in large numbers from that Pacific War in WWII, and in most
>modern conflicts from that point on.  (The Egyptian Osa II patrol
>boats that sank that Israeli destroyer in '73 is a good case.)  
>Sure, it isn't as sexy, but it's a lot more fun.  (Mark K. might 
>even be able to hit something with his pulse torps. (8-) )

I HEARD THAT!!!

Mk
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
I'm not giving in to security under pressure,
I'm not missing out on the promise of adventure,
I'm not giving up on implausible dreams -
Experience to extremes...experience to extremes....
					   Rush - "The Enemy Within"