Re: OFF-QUESTION: How big is an Alderson point?
From: "Christopher Weuve" <caw@w...>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 1997 12:52:07 -0500
Subject: Re: OFF-QUESTION: How big is an Alderson point?
On Sep 30, 1997 at 3:05:16 PM, "Phillip E. Pournelle"
<pepourne@nps.navy.mil>
wrote:
> I forwarded the question to Jerry but I can't guarrantee a response:
> Here's my take on the subject
Thanks, Phil!!
[my original question snipped]
> If I recall correctly, Alderson Points drift around an area based on
the
> interaction of the two generating stars, their current illumination,
> gravity waves and other perception distortions based on Relative
effect.
> Thus while you can place a station out in the area, it won't be in a
> stable orbit. Additonally, you must have Alderson Survey equipment to
> keep track of the Alderson point as it fluctuates and then a
maneuvering
> drive to stay on station. Even then it does not guarrantee that you
will
> have your crosshairs on the right place at the right time, plus the
> Alderson confusion effect works both ways because if the target
doesn't
> know where he is in relation to the universe (and the universe Vice
> versa), neither does the aimer... This is the hazard of introducing
> instantaneous travel into an Einsteinien universe...
> My suggestion is to have a mobile defense. Remember the
Alderson
> point is maintained in reference to the two stars not their systems,
> therefore you will not be in a stable orbit and stations will drift.
Okay, that fits. I also remember a comment from "Reflex" to the effect
that
the captain of the _Definat_ really wished the HQ in New Chicago would
send
out a survey ship so they could determine exactly where the point was.
If the
point has a tendency to wander around a bit, that would add to the
necessity
of such a survey. It might be needed anyway, of course, even if the
point
didn't move; determine an exact point in space relative to the star
would be
tough enough to do, and if the point DOEs move, getting it right to
within a
couple of hundred kiloklicks -- or more -- might be considered
extraordinairily lucky.
--Chris Weuve [My opinion, not my employers.]
mailto:caw@ascend.com (wk/day) mailto:caw@wizard.net (h)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Would you like to see Smith & Trowbridge's _Exordium_ reprinted? Help
their
editor, Beth Meacham, convince the Tor sales department -- send email to
her
at mailto:bam@tor.com. [http://www.wizard.net/~caw/exordium.htm]