Prev: Re: Stategic Thrust Next: Re: What I want (really!)

Re: Stargrunt II Transport

From: Sprayform <sprayform.dev@n...>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 1997 09:31:26 -0400
Subject: Re: Stargrunt II Transport

Steve in reply, you wrote:
>> As the rules read if you wish to use the NAC phalanx as a support
>> vehicle you leave the leader and a squaddie in it and detach the
>> rest. Same for hoplite & FSE AGCI-5B, but not so for NSL 
>
>Why do you say that? Is it because the LKPzW VI is the only vehicle 
>that specifically says that the crew are not part of the squad?
>
>I'd always assumed that the Phalanx and Wombat crews were likewise 
>not part of the squads. I looked at the stats, saw "Crew: 2" and 
>"Troop Spaces: 16 (or 8)" and assumed that the crew were separate.
>

Yes ,but is it then 16 troop spaces including or excluding the crew
positions? (I would tend to think it the latter on the basis of the NSL
LKPzW VI, which I thought was to counter balance the smaller squad)

>> (Can the vehicle leader take control of  the squad if their leader
>> becomes interested in real estate?)
>
>No. The vehicle leader is not a part of the squad.

So ,athough it has its own quality die for actions ,its not recognised
as a
command capable? 

>> Whats the concensous on ESU vehicles? size 3-4
>>					 armour 3-4
>>					 wheels/tracks
>
>No idea. Are there any APCs in the GZG range that haven't been 
>allocated yet?
>
There is a nice 8 wheeler APC in the DS II range that _I Want_ in 15mm!
  I think it should be size 3, Armour 3 and wheeled, crew ports for 1/2
firepower from the inside to either side but with limited support
weapons.
  
We could claim that for the ESU !

In the end though I buy the figures/vehicles that I like so if my FCT
end up
with a AGCI-5B cos its the only one in 15mm thats done, or I prefer who
cares about allocation!
I am however wanting guidelines for OOB's to take a basis from.

Jon(T.C.)
Sprayforming Developments Ltd.	      [production tools]
					   made in
				      [prototype  times]
  'The future is now'

Prev: Re: Stategic Thrust Next: Re: What I want (really!)