RE: [OFFICIAL] Where we're going from here...[SG & DS Supplement
From: trochej@s...
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 1997 11:44:32 -0400
Subject: RE: [OFFICIAL] Where we're going from here...[SG & DS Supplement
I thought More Thrust (in some cases :)) added too much to Full Thrust.
Oh
sure, I don't have to use any of the new toys but every rug rat in PDX
insists on using missiles and cloaking devices and doesn't want to play
the
quick and fun core rules anymore.
Thank You GZG!
At 12:59 PM 8/29/97 +1000, you wrote:
>I'll support this and so do three other gamers here not on the web!
>Owen Glover
>IT Services
>
>> ----------
>> From: Alfredo Lorente[SMTP:alfredo@bitstream.net]
>> Reply To: FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk
>> Sent: Thursday, 28 August 1997 22:07
>> To: FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk
>> Subject: Re: [OFFICIAL] Where we're going from here...[SG & DS
>> Supplement
>>
>> Hmmm....
>>
>> > > Well, add another to the minority. I would much rather see
>> > > expansions made to the SGII and DSII games than to see FT get an
>> > > overhaul.
>>
>> I don't think we are, neccesarily, such a minority after all. I
>> would imagine at least eight messages reiterating or supporting this
>> thought, but this is certainly not the most read thread going on
>> right now...
>>
>> Is there a more scientific way to establish this?
>>
>> Alfredo
>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------
>> Alfredo Lorente "End This." -- Delenn
>> Minneapolis, MN Lines of Communication
>> alfredo@bitstream.net Babylon 5
>>
>