Prev: Re: HAVOK - a kick in the a** for GW...? Next: RE: 121st Marine Reaction Co.

Re: LotGH to FT ideas?

From: Christopher Pratt <valen10@f...>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 1997 22:19:37 -0400
Subject: Re: LotGH to FT ideas?

Aaron P Teske wrote:
> 
> Excerpts from FT: 16-Aug-97 Re: LotGH to FT ideas? by "Mark A.
Siefert"@csd.uw
> > Aaron P Teske wrote:
> > > Besides, I've got the Mecha Press issue with the discussion on
LoGH. ^_^
> >
> >	    Does it have any info on the ships?
> 
> Hmm.	Y'know, I really don't remember.  In fact, I don't really
remember
> which one it is... either #6 or #9, I think, but I just dropped off
most
> of my gaming stuff back at CMU.  I'll check next week, when I get back
> there to stay for a while, and lket you know....
> 
> Later,
> 
>		      Aaron Teske
>		      Mithramuse+@cmu.edu

on another note, somebody said sugested using escorts in massed
formations in order to simulate the huge amounts of LotGH warships as
shown in the series...

I first heard of this idea while observating a game of the starblayzers
tactical system at gencon, the apparently (i didn't watch the game for
very long) most effective units on the table were the destroyer
groups...

i have been pondering this idea for a game of full thrust...buying
escort class ships in formations of three ships...and running them as
one model/unit

any suggestions, or somebody who can actually convince his friends to
play wanna try it out.....

chris "how many corvettes does it take to get to the center of a
superdreadnought" pratt
valen10@flash.net

Prev: Re: HAVOK - a kick in the a** for GW...? Next: RE: 121st Marine Reaction Co.