Prev: Re: Background Irrelevancy--and Poll (was Re: AIs and such...) Next: Re: Background Irrelevancy--and Poll (was Re: AIs and such...)

Re: FT: Missiles and Gas Tanks

From: Alan Brain <aebrain@d...>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 04:06:14 -0400
Subject: Re: FT: Missiles and Gas Tanks

Phillip E. Pournelle wrote:

> >What do you military guys say - can an air-to-air missile run out of
> >fuel? How radical maneuvers is it capable of?

OK, and omitting all classy data (exact ranges, velocities etc)

The Nato Sea Sparrow Missile (RIM-7H) has the following profile:
In the first A seconds, the primary booster accelerates it up to B
m/sec. The sustainer then cuts in at the range of C, where it has enough
energy to tackle a target pulling D gee. The speed changes slowly to E,
at a range of F, when it can tackle a target pulling G gee. Finally, the
sustainer cuts out at a range of H, whereupon the missile decelerates to
I at a range of J, when it only has enough energy to hit a target
pulling K gee. After that, it's deemed to be pretty much inneffective
except against a slow, non-manouvering target.

Source: Raytheon publicity brochure illustration. The actual figurtes
depend on air temperature, pressure, altitude of target etc as well.

As the RIM-7H is basically a modified AIM-7H (ie an Air-to-Air missile)
the same principles apply. The big difference is that at sea-level, the
air is much thicker than at 30,000 ft, so the speed and range is
accordingly reduced.
 
-- 
aebrain@dynamite.com.au     <> <>    How doth the little Crocodile
| Alan & Carmel Brain|	    xxxxx	Improve his shining tail?
| Canberra Australia |	xxxxxHxHxxxxxx _MMMMMMMMM_MMMMMMMMM
100026.2014 compuserve o OO*O^^^^O*OO o oo     oo oo	 oo  
		    By pulling MAERKLIN Wagons, in 1/220 Scale
See http://www.z-world.com/graphics/z/master/8856.gif for picture

Prev: Re: Background Irrelevancy--and Poll (was Re: AIs and such...) Next: Re: Background Irrelevancy--and Poll (was Re: AIs and such...)