Prev: Fw: Background Irrelevancy--and Poll (was Re: AIs and such...) Next: Re: Background Irrelevancy--and Poll (was Re: AIs and such...)

Fw: Spoiler Alert.......Omega Class DDs in B5

From: "Roger Gerrish" <Roger.Gerrish@b...>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 09:02:35 -0400
Subject: Fw: Spoiler Alert.......Omega Class DDs in B5



----------
> Hey, Mark

Thanks for the response
 
> >Also noted that the Omegas did not use their Lasers against the White
> >Stars, does this indicate the big Lasers can't be used against
targets
as
> >small or as manoeuverable as the White Stars.
> 
> Aaaactually, give yourself a treat and rewatch the ep. The POLLUX
fired
> a barrage of heavy beam weapons (HBWs, BREWs, whatever you wanna call
'em)
> that hit a White Star twice. Said White Star lost control and in a
burning
> fury slammed (not on purpose, I'm sure) into the forward structure of
the
> POLLUX, ultimately destroying the POLLUX.

You are absolutely right, I blame my fuzzy PAL video copy.

> If you look closely, there *seem* to be 4 aft lasers. In each corner
> there appears to be a similar tube projector which we have seen once
> in a while fire a laser.

Yep, Laser in Severed Dreams, Pulse Cannon/*DAF in No Retreat No
Surrender


> And it could have been one of those many pulse/pdaf projectors mounted
> all over the ship that suddenly was able to fire a laser.  ;-)

Pretty useful these EA weapons.
 
Perhaps the Lasers are a shorter ranged but more destructive application
of
the Pulse Cannon.
The 'Alexander' seemed to need to get pretty close to the
'Agrippa/Roanoke'
before she was 'in range' (I know cinematic licence, but!!)   

> The second thing is to get ahold of the official copy of Babylon 4
Wars
> game. They are more SFB in nature, but are supposed to be fairly
accurate
> in the weapons arrays on the ships (the AOG guys have been in contact
with
> jms on this matter, among other things).

Some chance, no licence in the UK, any chance anyone across the pond
could
help me out?
May be able to help you with wants in the UK. (However don't want to get
anyone in trouble with the FBI) 

> Third is to drop either JMS or George Johnsen a line. My experience
has
> shown George is more prone to answer.  ;-)

Will try.
 
Regards..... Roger

Prev: Fw: Background Irrelevancy--and Poll (was Re: AIs and such...) Next: Re: Background Irrelevancy--and Poll (was Re: AIs and such...)