RE: SG - Confidence Levels
From: "Glover, Owen" <oglover@m...>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 00:16:32 -0400
Subject: RE: SG - Confidence Levels
Well thanks for those that have responded so far (Daric Morris and Barry
Cadwgan), two similar but opposing views?! I think I'll continue playing
the worst factor for the time being.
> ----------
> From: jrmintz@juno.com[SMTP:jrmintz@juno.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 8 July 1997 4:31
> To: FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk
> Subject: Re: SG - Confidence Levels
>
>
> >Glover, Owen wrote:
> >>
> >> I think we've been playing Cl checks a little wrong; we do teh CL
> >> check
> >> with the highest or worst factor at the time of a given check
> >> requirement.
> >>
> No, you've been doing it right. The rules are pretty clear on that.
> Choose the highest factor that is merely a number. And factors that
> have
> are in the form of +X add to your base number. So if you are shot and
> suppressed for the first time, two line troopers die, and your squad
> leader bites it, you only test for the squad leader dying since it is
> the
> highest number. It seems kinda odd to me as well.
>
> -Bite The Wax Tadpole-
>
> Daric (jrmintz@juno.com) Morris
>