Prev: Re: "Harpoon in Space" Next: Re: "Harpoon in Space"

Re: "Harpoon in Space"

From: hosford.donald@e... (hosford.donald)
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 23:23:43 -0500
Subject: Re: "Harpoon in Space"

Roger Gerrish wrote:
> 
> Classification:
> Prologue:
> Epilogue:
> 
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Roger Gerrish/UK/IBM on 27-03-97
02:56 PM
> ---------------------------
> 
>	  GFDVM2.GERRISR @ D06AU003
>	  27-03-97 02:52 PM
> 
> > Oh, and disallow "C-batts as PDAFs" while you're at it.
> 
> >Come now, didn't a Royal Navy vessel get a kill on an Exocet missile
> >with her 114mm gun? All naval guns are dual-purpose.
> 
> I think you will find this was post-war myth to disguse the fact that
our Navy
> had no real defence against the Exocet,
> they either hit or missed.
> 
> Roger

Yah they do!  It's called the U.S. WW2 BATTLESHIP! :-) (It's the only
 class of ship left that can absorb a hit by an Exocet without
 scratching the paint!) 8-)

DOnald Hosford

Prev: Re: "Harpoon in Space" Next: Re: "Harpoon in Space"