Re: Conventional DS2?
From: jjm@z... (johnjmedway)
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 15:17:00 -0500
Subject: Re: Conventional DS2?
>> Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 12:06:26 -0500
>> From: Allan Goodall <agoodall@sympatico.ca>
>> Subject: Re: Conventional DS2?
...
>> >So eg
>> >Type: Sherman T34 model 1942 Panther Tiger 1E
>> > (ie76mm)
>> >Size: 3 3 4 5
>> >Armour: 2 3 4 5
>> >Engine: CFE CFE CFE CFE
>> >Mobility: Slow Trk Fast Trk FastTrk V.Slow.Trk
>> >Weapons: HVAC/3 HVAC/3 HVAC/4 HVAC/5
>> > (HVAC/4 in Firefly)
>> >Firecon: Enhanced Basic Superior Superior
>> >
>> >That actually looks pretty reasonable, I'd say...
>>
>> I could debate the Panther and Tiger 1E stats. The Tiger had thicker
armour
>> than the Panther, but the Panther's was better sloped and thus was
>> EFFECTIVELY thicker. Also (if I remember correctly), the Tiger's
88mm gun
>> while larger in calibre actually had a lower muzzle velocity than
the
>> Panther's long 75mm. However, change Tiger 1E to Tiger 2 and you've
probably
>> got it. I'd give a T34-85 the same stats as the Panther but with
Basic firecon.
Agreed. 'cept the speed of the Panther ought to be somewhere in between
the T-34 and the Tiger.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
| john_medway@zycor.lgc.com | Landmark Graphics Corp | 512.292.2325
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
| "I am not a user. I am a human being."
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---