Prev: Re: Should I go for it? Next: Re: Cosmic Balance + FT

Re: Conventional DS2?

From: jjm@z... (johnjmedway)
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 15:17:00 -0500
Subject: Re: Conventional DS2?

>>  Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 12:06:26 -0500
>>  From: Allan Goodall <agoodall@sympatico.ca>
>>  Subject: Re: Conventional DS2?
...
>>  >So eg
>>  >Type:	Sherman       T34 model 1942	 Panther     Tiger 1E
>>  >				 (ie76mm)
>>  >Size:	   3		    3		    4		5
>>  >Armour:	   2		    3		    4		5
>>  >Engine:	  CFE		   CFE		   CFE	       CFE
>>  >Mobility:	Slow Trk	Fast Trk	 FastTrk    V.Slow.Trk
>>  >Weapons:	 HVAC/3 	 HVAC/3 	  HVAC/4      HVAC/5  
>>  >	   (HVAC/4 in Firefly)
>>  >Firecon:	Enhanced	  Basic 	 Superior    Superior
>>  >
>>  >That actually looks pretty reasonable, I'd say...
>>  
>>  I could debate the Panther and Tiger 1E stats. The Tiger had thicker
armour
>>  than the Panther, but the Panther's was better sloped and thus was
>>  EFFECTIVELY thicker. Also (if I remember correctly), the Tiger's
88mm gun
>>  while larger in calibre actually had a lower muzzle velocity than
the
>>  Panther's long 75mm. However, change Tiger 1E to Tiger 2 and you've
probably
>>  got it. I'd give a T34-85 the same stats as the Panther but with
Basic firecon. 

Agreed. 'cept the speed of the Panther ought to be somewhere in between 
the T-34 and the Tiger.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
|  john_medway@zycor.lgc.com  |  Landmark Graphics Corp  |  512.292.2325
 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
|		 "I am not a user. I am a human being." 		
 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

Prev: Re: Should I go for it? Next: Re: Cosmic Balance + FT