RE: Re[2]: Re[2]: coupla Full Thrust questions inspire some tactics
From: Mike Miserendino <phddms1@c...>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 13:14:31 -0500
Subject: RE: Re[2]: Re[2]: coupla Full Thrust questions inspire some tactics
joachim wrote:
>funny. Railguns work ok, though. But not as good as the BMSO people
>say they do.
What's BMSO?
> I think if the people in FT have enough technology to shoot at
>things that are hundreds, thousands or maybe even millions of
>kilometers away, they probably have the technology to hit them.
Ditto.
> Oh and as for radar lighting one's self up for everyone to see, some
>of you might be interested to read an article in the November (?)
>issue of Scientific American about detectors that don't interact with
>the detected object. Well, they do, but to a tunable and arbitrarily
>small extent. It might be completely possible to make an _extremely_
>low emissions radar system at some time in the future.
As well as extremely low emission radar detectors. ;) New technology
has a
very short lifespan as cutting edge.
Mike Miserendino