Re: CMD Future Wars products
From: Adam Delafield <A.Delafield@b...>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 10:05:15 -0400
Subject: Re: CMD Future Wars products
Date sent: 19-AUG-1996 15:03:15
>>Good point. However, it DOESN'T look like a WWI tank! And I'm not
>>sure, but doesn't the Leopard II have a lower profile than the Tiger?
>Definately not WWI at all. I think the Loepard II is like 1-2' shorter,
>though I think just as wide. It's just strange to me (though I LOVE the
>look) That the US and UK are sloped in design, the Warsaw pact has
>rounded edges, but the germans still have the flat blockish design.
>Rumor has it that the Leopard III has sloped sides though.
>Paul
Don't the German tanks have more room in the turret (The reason for
not slopeing) giving them a higher rate of fire than most other
MBTs (As the crew have more room to work)?
+-------------------------------------+--------------------+
| Adam Delafield, I.T. Officer | Bolton Institute, |
| | Eagle Tower, |
| E-mail : ad4@Bolton.ac.uk | College Way, |
| Phone : +44 1204 528851 (ext 3163) | Bolton, UK. |
| Fax : +44 1204 399074 | BL3 5AE. |
+-------------------------------------+--------------------+