Full Thrust Java test list -- November 2006

Number 25 of 27 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

RE: MT Missiles



I would prefer something more MT style.  Gives a bit of variety to the
ordinance possibilities.

Brendan
'Neath Southern Skies
http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernskies/ 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Davis [mailto:davisje@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 November 2006 9:18 PM
> To: FTJava List
> Subject: MT Missiles
> 
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> We'd like your feedback on the Capital Missiles systems, i.e. 
> as written 
> in the More Thrust rulebook.
> 
> Should we implement them as written in the MT book or do something 
> closer to the FT3 playtest
> rules system?   In the playtest system, they move like salvo 
> missiles, 
> being placed before ships
> move.  In the MT system, they move with the P1, P2, or S1, S2 
> movement 
> systems.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Jon
> 
> 
> 
> 







  • Prev by Date: MT Missiles
  • Next by Date: Re: MT Missiles

  • Previous by thread: MT Missiles
  • Next by thread: Re: MT Missiles

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Thu Nov 30 02:07:25 GMT 2006