Re: Short game

[Tamashii2000 <tamashii2000@xxxxxxxxx>]

Point made, and I do applogize.. Honestly, I couldn't
remember the webpage I got it from when I wrote the
email.........



--- Indy <kochte@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Tamashii2000 wrote:
> > Yep, thats where I got it from (I did say I found
> it online) Hmm already in
> > the list have to go looking for it then.
> 
> It's generally customary to credit that which you
> find online. What
> if someone else wanted to go have a look at the
> original page?
> 
> Mk
> 
> 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Indy" <kochte@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <ftjava-test@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 12:53 PM
> > Subject: Re: Short game
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >>Tamashii2000 wrote:
> >>
> >>>textfilter: chose text/plain from a
> multipart/alternative
> >>>
> >>>I have a game I found online that I would like to
> try out:
> >>>
> >>>A NAC recon force probing the ESU lines
> >>>
> >>>Nac:                            ESU
> >>>2 Destroyers                3 Destroyers
> >>>1 Light Cruiser             2 Light Cruisers
> >>>1 Escort Cruister          1 Heavy Cruiser
> >>>1 Heavy Cruiser            1 Battle Cruiser
> >>>1 Battle Cruiser            1 BattleDread
> >>>1 Light Carrier
> >>>
> >>>Goals:
> >>>Nac: Destroy as many ESU ships as possible with
> out losing more then 50%
> > 
> > of its own fleet
> > 
> >>>ESU: Drive off The Nac recon Fleet with out
> suffering more then 50%
> > 
> > loses.
> > 
> >>>Neither side wishes a knock down drag out fight
> as that would leave
> > 
> > thier forces to weakened to protect the sector of
> space they are in (In the
> > ESU's case) or to continue with thier probing
> operations (Nac)
> > 
> >>>I have the file already set up.. just need
> someone to go up against..
> > 
> > both sides have fighters - so I can try out the
> new fighter interface...
> > (Hoot)
> > 
> >>>anyone want to play me.. don't care which side.
> >>
> >>That looks suspiciously like:
> >>http://www.bcpl.net/~indy/full-thrust/ft-s1.html
> >>
> >>which would be one of my scenarios. ;-)
> >>
> >>And if I am not mistaken, I believe Jon D has
> already put this into
> >>the FTJava scenario list.
> >>
> >>Mk
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>